No Child Left Behind The Need to Modify the Law

What dramatic techniques does Shakespeare use in Act Three Scene One of Romeo and Juliet Essays

What dramatic techniques does Shakespeare use in Act Three Scene One of Romeo and Juliet Essays What dramatic techniques does Shakespeare use in Act Three Scene One of Romeo and Juliet Paper What dramatic techniques does Shakespeare use in Act Three Scene One of Romeo and Juliet Paper Throughout the play Shakespeare maintains the interest of his audience through an array of dramatic techniques. Act Three Scene One sees a turning point in the play when what had originally been a comedy orientated genre, which traditionally ended in a marriage (as seen in Act 2 of the play), is replaced with that of a tragic nature.During his time in the play Mercutio maintains a humourous relationship with the audience with Could you not take some occasion without giving? This is an example of bawdy or sexual humour that would have appealed to the Elizabethan working class. Since he has kept comedy appearing in the play his final appearance, which involves his death, is a mixture of comic language and dramatic suffering.Mercutios final speeches reflect a mixture of anger and disbelief that he has been fatally injured as a result of the ancient grudge between the Capulets and the Montagues; he repeatedly curses, A plague on all your houses. Even his character istic wit is embittered as Mercutio treats the subject of his death with humourous wordplay: Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man. In the final irony of the scene he never learns the cause of his demise and believes it was because of a fight not love. The significance of curses lies firmly in Elizabethan culture as a dramatic phrase meant to cause harm to an individual. The use of it in this passage powerfully conveys Mercutios chaotic and maddened state of mind at his death.The entrance of Tybalt is also dramatic in that it has been foreshadowed by Benvolio and the Prologue at the beginning of the play: therefore turn and draw. Tybalt is the very essence of violence in the play and the very antithesis of all that Romeo stands for. Earlier in the play Tybalt is angered at the behavior of Romeo at the ball and so this creates situational tension for the audiences who are aware of this fact and so expect conflict to occur later in the play.In Shakespeares time, audien ces would have expected actors in tragedies to speak in verse. The poetic style was thought to be elegant and expressive, particularly useful in tragic themes in scenes of high dramatic or emotional intensity. Higher status characters such as the Prince would have been expected to use this formal style as it carried with itself a great deal of dignity in Elizabethan England as it was most usually associated with the upper classes. Much of Shakespeares verse is written in Sonnet form. Sonnets were at the time very popular and they are used frequently in the play. Although much of it has rhyme there is a great deal of blank unrhymed verse throughout the play in iambic pentameter. The use of different forms of speech in Romeo and Juliet identifies the seriousness of the text with rhymed verse as the most serious and prose rather more casual.Prose, which is blank speech, was traditionally used by lower status or comic characters such as the servants of the families; it is very informal. Notably Shakespeare breaks this rule when he has the character Mercutio, who as a family friend of the Montague house would be considered high status, speak in prose at his death.I am hurt. A plague o both your houses! I am sped. Is he gone, and hath nothing?Tragic death scenes would almost always be spoken in verse; however the use of prose in these lines emphasizes the significance of Mercutios death and adds a sense of urgency and panic to the scene.Within the scene Shakespeare demonstrates the hostility between one character and another by references to rank. When Romeo enters Tybalt addresses him as my man which refers to Romeo as his servant and therefore of lower hierarchy than himself. Family pride was very important to both the play and Elizabethan culture so references to class were an effective insult.What is notable is the manner at which Tybalt addresses Mercutio in this scene. At first he uses addresses like you and gentleman which are associated with formality and cl ass. However once Tybalt has accused Mercutio of consortd with Romeo his attitude towards him quickly turn hostile and he starts to address Mercutio informally and less respectfully with thee and thou. This foreshadows the conflict that will occur later in this scene and sets a feeling of unrest over the drama.Shakespeare uses dramatic irony to create tension in this scene or to draw the attention of the audience. This occurs when a character on stage is ignorant, but the audience watching know his or her eventual fate.At the beginning of this scene Romeo, by contrast to the other characters, is cheerful and contented with having wed Juliet a moment beforehand. Until Mercutios dies Romeo remains emotionally detached from the other characters by thoughts of peace and harmony between the two houses. In response to Tybalts insults Romeo tells him the reason I have to love you, doth much excuse the appertaining rage. Ironically Romeos refusal to fight brings about the very violence he h ad hoped to prevent and Mercutio, fuelled by family pride decides to fight Tybalt instead. Thus Romeos gesture of peace results in Mercutios death and he becomes ensnared in the family conflict once more.This is also known as cosmic or fate irony in which unseen beings are seen to be toying with the minds of the characters with deliberate ironic effect. This is often seen between the contrast of human ideals and reality such as Friar Lawrences choice to bring the two lovers in marriage in hope of turning their households rancour to pure love. By the end of the play this is achieved but at the hands of death not matrimony.The prologue is ironic in that the eventual fates of the characters are told on stage right from the beginning. In the line A pair of star crossed lovers take their lives, Shakespeare informs his audience that the death of the lovers was preordained, the deliberate act of misfortune.Tybalts death brings Romeo a moment of clarity as he realizes he is the helpless vic tim of fate: O, I am fortunes fool! he cries, struck deeply by a sense of frustration and injustice. The speed with which Mercutio and Tybalts death occur, together with Romeos marriage and subsequent banishment, all contribute to a sense of inevitability-that a chain of events have been set in motion over which the protagonist has no control.In conclusion the dramatic intensity of the story heightens with the opening of Act Three as a result of fate and conflict between the rival houses. The violent clash between Tybalt and Romeo escalates the drama around whether or not love will ever be able to exist openly between the two lovers. The prologue sets up a sense of hopelessness by the audience who know how the story will conclude and foreshadows the eventual death of the two lovers a death made more tragic by the grip fate has on the helpless protagonist.

The Great Recession 2008 Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

The Great Recession 2008 - Term Paper Example According to the research findings the 2007 global financial crisis has had serious impacts on the economies of many countries, resulting to what economists call the Great Recession. The downturn began initially as an isolated problem with the sub-prime sector in the US housing market, mutating to a serious and fatal recession by the beginning of 2008. Consequently, other nations especially in the European Union followed the US into the crisis by mid-2008. In essence, 2009 was the first recorded year in history that the global economy was actually in recession since the Second World War. Interestingly, the recession came as a surprise to many economists, investor, academics, policy-makers, and multilateral agencies. For instance, Organization for Economic Co-operation Development’s Jean-Philippe Cotis was quoted as speculating further growth in the global economy because of the buoyancy of emerging economies and favoring financial conditions. After the economy drove into reces sion, the economics profession was under fire for failure to predict the financial downturn. As a result, there were few intellectual conversations taking place between scholars of like minds. Therefore, the underestimation of the severity of the global downturn was not surprising. Indeed, some leading financial forecasters like World Bank and International Monetary Funds revised their initial to their growth forecasts in 2008 and 2009. Nonetheless, there were warnings from a few economists of a brewing economical disaster. A portion of the economist predicted a looming recession based on economic models where the accumulation of the private sector was the central cause. However, their cries were not significant enough for the majority of the lulled individuals. Despite all these, the warning signs were blinking red: loose monetary policy especially in the US, lax in financial regulation, misperception of risk and search for yield, and huge current deficits in UK, US, and other supe r economies that accumulated huge savings of oil exporters and emerging economies. Events of 2008, with emphasis on the collapse and consequent closure of Lehman Brother, reversed the perceptions of risk-taking banks (Clungston, 2008). However, the complexity and nature mortgage-backed securities left most banks in the dark concerning the exact level of liabilities that was linked to the severing housing sector in the US. Thus, liquidity of most banks dried up, literary bringing the global financial system to a halt. Some critiques were quick to question the survival of the American-style capitalism. Governments in developing and advanced countries were quick to react aggressively, injecting obscene credit amounts into their financial markets, reducing interest rates, nationalizing banks, and unveiling stimulus packages to increase discretionary spending. Most policymakers were determined to avoid mistakes from previous crises, and their response was important avoiding disastrous de pression in most countries,